Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.
Identifieur interne : 000268 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000267; suivant : 000269Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.
Auteurs : Bertil Friberg [Suède] ; Torsten Jemt [Suède]Source :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1708-8208 ] ; 2015.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Comorbidité, Complications postopératoires (épidémiologie), Facteurs de l'âge, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Résorption alvéolaire (épidémiologie), Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Suède (épidémiologie), Échec de restauration dentaire (), Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- épidémiologie : Complications postopératoires, Résorption alvéolaire, Suède.
- Comorbidité, Facteurs de l'âge, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Age Factors, Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (epidemiology), Comorbidity, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Restoration Failure (statistics & numerical data), Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mandible (surgery), Osseointegration, Postoperative Complications (epidemiology), Sweden (epidemiology), Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- epidemiology : Alveolar Bone Loss, Postoperative Complications, Sweden.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Restoration Failure.
- surgery : Mandible.
- Age Factors, Aged, Comorbidity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Osseointegration, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
In three former reports, the present team has presented the 1-year outcome of four different treatment procedures handling the edentulous mandible; that is, two-stage and one-stage surgery with turned Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 1 and 2) and one-stage surgery using either 5 or 4 TiUnite™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 3 and 4).
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12116
PubMed: 23879577
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23879577Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.</title><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Göteborg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Göteborg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23879577</idno><idno type="pmid">23879577</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cid.12116</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000418</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000418</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000418</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000418</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000418</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000418</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.</title><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Göteborg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Göteborg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (epidemiology)</term><term>Comorbidity</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Postoperative Complications (epidemiology)</term><term>Sweden (epidemiology)</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Comorbidité</term><term>Complications postopératoires (épidémiologie)</term><term>Facteurs de l'âge</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (épidémiologie)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Suède (épidémiologie)</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire ()</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Sweden</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Complications postopératoires</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term><term>Suède</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Aged</term><term>Comorbidity</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Comorbidité</term><term>Facteurs de l'âge</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In three former reports, the present team has presented the 1-year outcome of four different treatment procedures handling the edentulous mandible; that is, two-stage and one-stage surgery with turned Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 1 and 2) and one-stage surgery using either 5 or 4 TiUnite™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 3 and 4).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23879577</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>22</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1708-8208</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>413-24</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/cid.12116</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">In three former reports, the present team has presented the 1-year outcome of four different treatment procedures handling the edentulous mandible; that is, two-stage and one-stage surgery with turned Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 1 and 2) and one-stage surgery using either 5 or 4 TiUnite™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) implants (Group 3 and 4).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of the present investigation was to follow up these patients for a period of 5 years with regard to implant/prosthesis cumulative survival rates, marginal bone loss calculations, clinical complications, and results related to age at surgery.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A total of 385 patients, provided with 1,838 implants, were originally included in the four patient groups. All patients received fixed prostheses. The overall majority of patients had each five implants placed. Radiographs were obtained at prosthesis delivery, at the 1 and 5-year follow-up.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A total of 1,230 implants in 259 patients (67%) were possible to follow up for 5 years. Implant Cumulative Survival Rates (CSR) in 5 years for Groups 1-4 were 99.7, 97.0, 98.5, and 98.6%. The corresponding prosthesis treatment CSR was 100, 99.3, 98.5, and 98.6%, respectively. Significantly, more patients (p< .05) lost turned implants after one-stage surgery (Group 2). Frequency distributions of implants revealed that >1.2 mm bone loss was observed around 75 implants (6.4%). The moderately rough central (midline) implant showed more bone loss than other placed implants (Group 3; p< .05). The youngest half of included patients at surgery (Youngest(50%) ; n=193) presented significantly higher mortality than older patients as well as compared to normal population (p< .05). Patients in the Younger(50%) group showed also an association to patients with complete loss of all implants and patients with most implants with obvious bone loss after 5 years.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">All four treatment procedures served well during the 5 years of follow-up and only eight patients (2.1%) were complete failures or showed obvious bone loss (>1.8 mm) at several implants (>2 implants), mostly observed in younger patients. The few complications in relation to implant failure and/or obvious bone loss could be associated to both local impact factors (surface, implant site, surgical protocol) as well as to host response factors (systemic health).</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Friberg</LastName><ForeName>Bertil</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jemt</LastName><ForeName>Torsten</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>24</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000367" MajorTopicYN="N">Age Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015897" MajorTopicYN="N">Comorbidity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013548" MajorTopicYN="N">Sweden</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">5-year study</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">early loading</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">edentulous mandibles</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">implant site</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">implant surface</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">local impact</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">one-stage surgery</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">oxidized oral implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">patient mortality</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">systemic health</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23879577</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/cid.12116</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Suède</li></country></list><tree><country name="Suède"><noRegion><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000268 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000268 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23879577
|texte= Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23879577" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |